COLIBRI 2016

hollywood_colibri_flyer_2016_new

Documents Downloads

2016 Rules

[ddownload id=”893″]

2016 Application

[ddownload id=”890″]

Posted in Official

СОВЕТЫ НАЧИНАЮЩИМ ВОКАЛИСТАМ

singing-kid

Никогда не начинайте петь не разогревшись
Ваши голосовые связки нуждаются в предварительной разминке перед тем как начнете петь. Чрезмерные нагрузки «холодных» голосовых связок могут привести к необратимым последствиям. Всегда нужно иметь запас времени на разогрев — минимум за десять минут до начала полноценной работы связок. Это поможет не только подготовить голос, но и успокоит вас (увеличение поступления кислорода в легкие помогает расслабиться).

Пойте так же, как вы говорите
Ваши голосовые связки в течении жизни привыкают к определенному стилю и диапазону громкости. Это означает, что если вы в жизни «тихоня», то сразу начать исполнять репертуар Кристины Агилеры будет, как минимум, стрессом для ваших голосовых связок и может, наоборот, сделать их слабее. Это связано с привычным для вашего организма процессом выпуска воздуха из диафрагмы. Начинайте с привычного уровня громкости и постепенно, занятие за занятием, совершенствуйте свои способности, приближаясь к желаемому уровню.

Лимон ?
Лимон — это не сумма потраченных денег, чтобы стать поп-звездой. Лимон — это фрукт, который поможет подготовить ваши голосовые связки. Кислоты лимона сделают ваше горло чистым, а дыхание свежим, как в рекламе! Долька лимона и стакан воды очистят ваше горло и, не исключено, поднимут вам настроение.

Шоколад и молочные продукты перед пением уменьшают ваш диапазон
Молочные продукты и шоколад образуют в горле пленку, которая будет мешать вам петь. Эта пленка не позволит вашим голосовым связкам раскрыть полный диапазон движения и вибраций. Плюс постоянное чувство необходимости очистить горло.

Никогда не пойте, когда у вас нет на это настроения
Если вы поете для аудитории, то она обязательно это почувствует. То же самое и в студии в процессе записи. Не давайте возможности ненужным эмоциональным переживаниям взять верх над вами на сцене или в студии. Если вы просто хотели потренироваться и вы не в настроении, то перенесите тренировку, так как ничего хорошего из этого все равно не выйдет. Ваше настроение влияет на ваши тональные качества, а мышцы лица испытывают психо-физический стресс.

Стресс? Дышите глубже!

Если у вас стресс на сцене или в процессе записи, либо испытываете тревогу перед тренировкой — просто сделайте несколько глубоких вдохов. Состояние тревоги возникает, как естественная реакция на стресс, в следствии чего дыхание становится коротким, быстрым, повышается давление, возникает сухость в горле. Для борьбы с этим сделайте несколько медленных и очень глубоких вдохов. После чего в организме будет значительно больше кислорода, который поможет расслабить мышцы. Вскоре уровень тревоги начнет падать и вы почувствуете себя гораздо лучше.

Keep singing!
Просто продолжайте петь, так как вам это нравится и больше всего подходит. И это не только улучшит ваши вокальные способности, но и обязательно изменит вашу жизнь в лучшую сторону!

#‎urfavelessons

Posted in Editorial

Useful Links

links

Articles about Music Lessons and Benefits
http://www.childrensmusicworkshop.com/advocacy/

Posted in Editorial

Choosing A Music Teacher A-to-Z

by Mischa Kopitman

music_teacher

Great teacher is a guide. He/she hopefully went through rigorous training as a musician and a performer and has experienced and negotiated all the highs and lows we musicians experience– and overcame it all! Having experienced the joys and sufferings of music making, good teacher should have compassion to guide his/her students through the same process–with kindness and an occasional firm hand
When contacted, teachers are usually more than willing to explain their techniques and educational backgrounds. The following are types of questions to ask during the first interview:

1. What is your professional and educational experience in music?
2. What is your teaching experience? What age groups do you teach?
3. Do you have a written policy? Can I see it?
4. What methods and materials do you use?
5. What styles of music do you teach and most comfortable with (classical, jazz pop etc)
6.Do you offer group lessons?
7. Do you hold student recitals? How often?
8. Any of your students participate in competitions and/or festivals?
9. Do you require your students to take music exams (MTNA, ABRSM)
10. How much practice time do you require each day?
11. How much do you charge? Monthly? Any discounts? What forms of payments you accept?
12. What is your policy regarding cancellations of lessons and make-up lessons?
Can we do a trial period, say one month?
13. Do you offer half-hour, 45 minutes, one hour lessons?
14. Any opportunity to participate in ensemble (duos, trios quarters…) performance activities?

Next entry: Questions a teacher might ask before accepting YOU as a student!

Dr.Mischa Kopitman, Piano instructor, East Los Angeles College; Private piano composition and theory teaching  in Beverly Hills and San Gabriel Valley areas. Specializes in preparation to Music college entrances ( piano and theory) and ABRSM examinations. Artistic Director: Amadeus Young Soloists Competition Jury chairman, Hollywood Angel Cup Competition. Contact:: opus110@lycos.com
Posted in Editorial

Winning a Music Competition: Evaluation Part 1

kopitman

by  Mischa Kopitman

“Music is your own experience, your thoughts, and your wisdom. If you don’t live it, it won’t come out of your horn.” – Charlie Parker

This series of articles is addressed to novice and experienced young solo musicians who enter the field of competitive music-making. These ideas are not intended as a cookie-cutter blueprint for winning, as no such blueprint exists. However, I’m confident that some of my suggestions, if followed, can help young soloist maximize his/her chances for success. Feel free to consider and experiment. Use ideas you feel comfortable with and discard those that don’t fit your personal approach or the ones your teacher disagrees with. Most importantly: Be Unique! Be Original! Be Yourself!

                                           


I.  Evaluation Elements

    Competition administrations usually provide jury members with evaluating forms, which list judging categories for assessment. Some competitions use very elaborate forms, some rather simple forms. Usually, scores from all judges are averaged and average score used to determine winners.

Here are some general areas of music performance evaluated in these forms: Artistic ability, musicianship, presentation, technique, interpretation, stage presence, ability to communicate music structure and conform to correct stylistic interpretation and so on. Sounds complex? Yes. It does.

Let’s briefly discuss the main categories:

  • Technique: (Differs from instrument to instrument): Note and rhythm accuracy: Pedaling; Correct pitch and intonation: Secure finger-work; Breath control; Vocal color; Secure scale and arpeggio passages etc.

  • Musicality: Appropriate and expressive dynamics and articulation: Expressive phrasing; Valid stylistic interpretation; Ability to communicate overall structure of the piece and its rhythmic, harmonic and melodic elements. Appropriate tempo; Appropriate interpretation of the score compatible with generally accepted practice etc.

  • Presentation: Poise: Stage presence: Ability to communicate music to the audience etc.

  • X factor: Some call it “artistry,” or “artistic ability.” Some call it “talent” or “potential.” This element (if included in adjudication) is the most difficult to assess.

                                                                                                                 

II.Making  an Impression

    Competition judges are musicians who dedicated many years to intense music study. We all respect dedication, commitment, and passion for music making. Experienced competition jury judges  can and will recognize those qualities in your performance!

If you appear to play mechanically and without total involvement, the judges will not be kind to you. But if you appear to be sensitive to music and carefully craft every phrase, every interval, every note, the judges will reward you for it. Several years ago I adjudicated a teen cellist. He playing was secure and he appeared focused and “into it.” But then, an audience member walked into the hall to the side of the stage. The cellist took his attention from the music to openly stare at the person walking by. While still playing the piece without any changes.  It made a very negative impression on me. He didn’t win a prize. Moral of the story: Be “into it.” Respect the music!

III.Competition Judges: Who Evaluates the Evaluators

“The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function”— Scott F. Fitzgerald

      Consider that evaluation in performing arts is mostly subjective. Jury members are musicians with (often) well-established tastes in music. And their assessment of performance often varies. Sometimes by a wide margin. And often with well-articulated and specific reasons! And ALL of them are correct. Because music assessment is a combination of objective and subjective elements. Examples of objective elements—accurate performance of notes, rhythms.  Examples of subjective elements—interpretation, music artistry, ability to communicate e with the audience.

     Most jury members strive to be objective and impartial. To develop successful professional careers, musicians (without exception) undergo many years of rigorous examinations and evaluations. Most jury musicians are sensitive and compassionate to those undergoing the same. We want to award every performer who practiced hard and has the bravery to walk out onto the stage and play their heart out. But that would make the evaluation process meaningless. Choices must be made. However painful. This has been my experience, and I am certain this is an experience of every jury member, performer, and music lover faced with making musical choices.

Music is a transcendent and highly abstract and subjective art form. Let’s all humbly accept it and serve the fickle Muse to the best of our ability!

                       

  IV.Old Competition Scandal: Subjective Passion and Objective Fury

1980. Brilliant young pianist Ivo Pogorelich didn’t make the finals of Chopin Piano Competition due to his mildly unusual Chopin playing. But some of the judges (Martha Argerich and Paul Badura-Skoda) thought Ivo was a genius and quit the jury in furious protest. What happened to Pogorelich? He turned the loss into a great recording contract and became a music star. The actual winner of  1980 Chopin competition—not so much. A lesson in subjectivity.


You Be The Judge

Listen to one of the performances that lost Pogorelich the competition, but won him stardom.
Chopin Scherzo No. 3, Op. 39

 

Compare it to one of the last great Romantics, Arthur Rubinstein playing the same piece:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=defpNc1TQNI

Evaluate technique, dynamics, tempo, rubatos, musical expression and stage presence. Which one do you prefer? Why?  Please post your comments.

To be continued…

Please read Part 2 of the Winning A Music Competition: Sight Over Sound.

© 2015 Mischa Kopitman. All Rights Reserved.

Dr.Mischa Kopitman. Ukrainian-born veteran competition adjudicator, highly experienced piano, theory and composition teacher and performer. He’s a piano instructor at East Los Angeles College who also lectured at California State University, Northridge, among others. Formerly, music co-editor for” Creative Child” magazine. Dr. Kopitman maintains a busy schedule teaching in San Gabriel and Beverly Hills areas specializing in ABRSM examinations, adjudicating competitions and studio work. He’s currently editing a collection of intermediate piano pieces based on Chinese folk melodies. Mischa can be reached at opus110@lycos.com

Posted in Editorial